Skip to content


Is In re Bilski a Déjà Vu?

By Stefania Fusco

On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) issued a decision that has potentially significant implications for innovation in many fields, but particularly in the online commerce and the software industry. Indeed, with the issuance of In re Bilski, the Federal Circuit has substantially changed its position regarding the criteria for the patentability of a claim to a process and, thus, has reconsidered its own precedent, State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. Continued…

Posted in Perspectives.

February 16, 2009 Cite: 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. P1


A Free Speech Theory of Copyright

By Steven J. Horowitz

Copyright is a system of federal regulation that empowers private actors to silence others, yet no one seriously doubts that copyright is consistent in principle with the First Amendment freedom of speech. Scholars and courts have tried to resolve the tension between exclusive rights in expression and free speech in one of two ways: some appeal to copyright’s built-in accommodations to suppress any independent First Amendment analysis, while others apply standard First Amendment tests to evaluate whether and where copyright becomes an unconstitutional burden on speech. Neither of these approaches properly appreciates the constitutional balance struck at the Framing between the Copyright Clause and the First Amendment. This Article develops a free speech theory of copyright informed by this balance. I advocate thinking of the Copyright Clause’s limits as free speech limits, giving them the force of an individual right. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

January 5, 2009 Cite: 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 2


Historic Perspectives on Law & Science

By Robin Feldman

Law has had a long and troubled relationship with science. The misuse of science within the legal realm, as well as our failed attempts to make law more scientific, are well documented. The cause of these problems, however, is less clear. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

January 2, 2009 Cite: 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1


A Regulatory Proposal for Digital Defamation

Conditioning §230 Safe Harbor on the Provision of a Site "Rating"

By Caitlin Hall

Whatever lip service we may pay to those spaces “immemorially . . . held in trust for the use of the public,” the Internet is operatively the most important public forum ever created. Its vast interconnectivity far more nearly approximates the prototypical “marketplace of ideas” than do warring politicos duking it out on the op-ed pages or, for that matter, in opposing briefs. However, the very features that make the internet fertile ground for cultural and political discourse—anonymity and pseudonymity; intellectual symbiosis and parasitism; fractal sprawl, audience dispersal and many-to-many architecture—render it a treacherous landscape for its custodians. In recognition of that fact, Congress in 1996 passed the Communications Decency Act, which nearly eliminated the liability that website administrators face for third-party generated content. Continued…

Posted in Notes.

December 9, 2008 Cite: 2008 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. N1


Taking the “Long View” on the Fourth Amendment

Stored Records and the Sanctity of the Home

By Deirdre K. Mulligan and Jack Lerner

In the wake of the California energy crisis of 2000-2001, the California Energy Commission (CEC) and California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) are aggressively pursuing “demand response” (DR) energy programs aimed at reducing peak energy demand. Demand response systems convey information about market conditions through pricing or reliability signals to customers, who in turn, hopefully, alter their electricity consumption choices. In particular DR programs are aimed at shifting the time at which customers use energy through the implementation of time-varying tariffs. Armed with information about the time-varying cost of electricity residential and commercial customers are expected to reduce energy usage and/or shift their usage to non-peak, less costly, hours. Such shifts, even absent reductions in overall consumption, will reduce the likelihood of energy brown and black outs and provide direct savings to consumers. Technologies to enable the demand response system, including advanced metering research and development [OpenAMI] and sensor and control technologies development [DRETD], are under development. These technologies will be coupled with a communication and network infrastructure that supports the multicast of real-time pricing information, and the aggregation of energy usage and billing information. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

February 2, 2008 Cite: 2008 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 3


The Olmsteadian Seizure Clause

The Fourth Amendment and the Seizure of Intangible Property

By Paul Ohm

The Fourth Amendment’s Seizure clause is mired in the Eighteenth century. Its counterpart, the Search clause, has evolved through a steady progression of Supreme Court cases from Katz to Berger to Kyllo, no longer to be confined to the property-based notions of privacy embodied in Olmstead v. United States. Instead it is sensitive to modern privacy concerns by extending Constitutional protection to situations that satisfy the reasonable expectation of privacy test. While imperfect, the evolved Search clause has kept the protections of the Fourth Amendment relevant in an age of digital evidence, ubiquitous communication networks, and increasingly sophisticated and invasive surveillance capabilities. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

January 28, 2008 Cite: 2008 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 2


Rights “Chipped” Away

RFID and Identification Documents

By Nicole A. Ozer

The ACLU of Northern California has been a leader in generating public and legislative attention to the privacy, personal safety, and financial security risks associated with the use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology in government-issued identification documents, such as drivers’ licenses and student ID cards. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

January 25, 2008 Cite: 2008 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1


First Principles of Communications Privacy

By Susan Freiwald

Under current Fourth Amendment doctrine, parties to a communication enjoy constitutional protection against government surveillance only when they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in those communications. This paper discusses the insufficiency of the reasonable expectation of privacy test in the context of modern communications. Significantly, courts have required that communications media be virtually invulnerable before affording them Fourth Amendment protection. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

June 18, 2007 Cite: 2007 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 3


The Patentability of Enantiomers

Implications for the Pharmaceutical Industry

By Jonathan J. Darrow

Pharmaceutical sales constitute a $600-billion-per-year global industry. Less well-known is that more than half of the drugs listed in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia contain a class of compounds known as chiral molecules as the active pharmaceutical ingredient. Chiral molecules have special chemical and pharmacological properties that raise questions as to their patentability. When chiral molecules are synthesized in the laboratory, two distinct mirror-image molecules are formed called “enantiomers.” Although each enantiomer may have different levels of therapeutic activity and toxicity, technical challenges to separating the enantiomers caused most early chiral drugs to be sold as mixtures of the two molecules, or racemic mixtures. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

February 27, 2007 Cite: 2007 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 2


The Spectrum Commons in Theory and Practice

By Jerry Brito

The radio spectrum is a scarce resource that has been historically allocated through command-and-control regulation. Today, it is widely accepted that this type of allocation is as inefficient for spectrum as it would be for paper or land. Many commentators and scholars, most famously Ronald Coase, have advocated that a more efficient allocation would be achieved if government sold the rights to the spectrum and allowed a free market in radio property to develop. Continued…

Posted in Articles.

February 10, 2007 Cite: 2007 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1