This article presents four cyberspace speech controversies that involve hostile environment harassment law. The author uses these examples to draw two conclusions. First, in most of the controversies, the result should largely be driven not by the medium, but by relatively medium- independent underlying free speech principles. Second, in a system built on precedent and on litigation by many plaintiffs in many courts, speech restrictions accrete over time, with each victory for restriction laying the groundwork for broader restrictions in the future. This tendency can, of course, be resisted—but it ought not be ignored.
To receive updates from STLR on upcoming publications and events, please email email@example.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.
- Steve B on Investing in America’s Future Through Innovation
- Monday Morning JETLawg | JETLaw: Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law on Investing in America’s Future Through Innovation
- Brian Kahin on Investing in America’s Future Through Innovation
- Mark Hughes on Copyright Vigilantism
- Copyright in the Digital Age Symposium « Digital Media Law Seminar SP13 on 2013 Symposium
- Stanford 2013 Technology and Law Review’s Symposium « Digital Media Law Seminar SP13 on 2013 Symposium
- Cloud Computing Contracts and geolocation « Data-Center.BlogNotions - Thoughts from Industry Experts on Negotiating Cloud Contracts